Software-defined vehicles (SDVs) were introduced with the promise of extending a vehicle’s “relevance” through continuous software updates. Manufacturers promoted the idea that cars could ‘level-up’ long after leaving the factory, gaining new features and performance improvements over their lifespan.
Made simple, cars would literally have the power to evolve as technology improves and connectivity becomes more advanced.
However, as the first generation of these vehicles matures, questions are emerging about lifecycle costs, hardware limitations and long-term responsibility: are the glitzy promises made by automakers simply too good to be true?
The automotive sector has embraced the narrative that software updates will ensure that the next generation of cars has digital longevity. Over-the-air updates (OTAs) enhanced driver assistance systems and intelligent infotainment opportunities are positioned as tools to keep vehicles competitive for a decade or more. What remains less examined is the economic and logistical burden attached to maintaining complex software ecosystems over the full lifespan of a vehicle, which can exceed 15 years in many cases.
In other words, can the software and hardware find operational alignment, or will they fall out of sync?
Mechanical platforms are engineered for durability measured in decades, while software development cycles operate on much shorter timelines. In consumer electronics, like phones and computers, even the most extended support periods rarely translate into sustained relevance over time. Smartphones may now receive updates for several years, but hardware constraints eventually limit performance and compromise compatibility.
How do we ensure that a similar pattern does not unfold in the vehicle market?
Industry projections suggest that during the first five to seven years, software-defined vehicles will receive feature expansions and capability upgrades. Between seven and 10 years, updates are more likely to focus on optimisation and defect correction. Beyond that point, support may be limited to security patches and regulatory compliance. While the vehicle remains mechanically operational, its digital architecture may no longer support meaningful innovation, and it will subsequently lose value and “relevance” for consumers.
This increasing emphasis on software-defined vehicles has profound financial implications. Maintaining legacy software platforms requires engineering resources, cybersecurity oversight and validation processes that were not historically part of long-term vehicle ownership. If hardware was not designed with upgrade pathways in mind, manufacturers may face customer dissatisfaction or pressure to offer expensive retrofits. Service networks may also experience increased complexity as aging digital systems require specialised attention.
The industry has yet to manage a full software-defined vehicle lifecycle at global scale. As more connected models enter their second decade of operation, manufacturers will need to reconcile customer expectations of “future-ready” mobility with the technical realities of aging software platforms.
Without clear lifecycle planning, vehicles risk remaining mechanically sound while becoming digitally outdated, raising concerns about security, compliance and long-term value retention.
As we move into an increasingly software- defined future, automakers must plan ahead to ensure hardware and software architecture does not fall perilously out of sync.
Keep up-to-date with the latest mobility news by subscribing to MOVEMNT’s free newsletter
